“All risks” in motor insurance is a type of protection where the policy covers not just one or two separate scenarios, but a wide range of problems that may happen to a car. Put very simply, it is not insurance only “against accidents” or only “against theft,” but broader protection of the vehicle against different troubles: accidents, natural disasters, fire, actions of third parties, and other cases, if they are not excluded by the contract. The main idea is simple: “all risks” does not mean “absolutely everything without any exceptions,” but rather the widest possible coverage within the terms of the policy.
When a person hears the phrase “all risks,” it is easy to imagine that the insurance will cover absolutely any problem with the car without a single limitation. But in insurance, it works a bit more carefully than that.
Put simply:
So “all risks” is not a magic formula meaning “we always pay for everything,” but the broadest format of coverage compared with narrower programs.
The logic of this kind of policy is quite practical. Instead of choosing protection only from one threat, the car owner buys a program that covers several major scenarios at once.
Usually, it looks like this:
That is why when you see the words “all risks,” it is important to look not only at the attractive name, but also at the real terms inside the contract.
In practice, in motor insurance this approach usually means protection against a wide set of threats. The list may differ from one company to another, but it often includes:
So the purpose of this type of protection is to cover not only a “road” problem, but also other troubles that may happen to the car while it is being used or parked.
This is one of the most important points.
Even if a program is called “all risks,” it still has boundaries. In insurance, there are almost always:
For example, if the owner violated the contract terms, failed to confirm the circumstances of the incident, or the case is directly excluded from coverage, there may be no automatic payment.
In other words, “all risks” means broad coverage, not the absence of rules.
The difference is usually in the width of coverage.
For example, one program may include only accidents, theft, and natural events, while another also includes fire, falling objects, actions of third parties, and other situations. That is why two KASKO policies may differ greatly in price, even though both look like “car insurance” from the outside.
Most often, an “all risks” policy is attractive to people who do not want to guess what kind of trouble may happen to the car.
It is especially useful if:
Put simply, this format is usually chosen by those who want fewer risks for their wallet and more peace of mind.
Insurance risk — an event against which the protection works.
For example, an accident, fire, theft, or hail.
Exclusion from coverage — a situation in which the policy does not work, even if outwardly the case looks like an insured event.
That is why reading the contract is just as important as reading the product advertisement.
Deductible — the part of the loss that the car owner pays personally.
Because of it, the payment may be lower than the full amount of the loss.
Sum insured — the maximum limit above which the coverage does not apply.
This is the financial ceiling under the contract.
When choosing such a program, it is important not to focus only on the words “all risks.”
It is better to check right away:
This matters because two companies may use similar names for policies that differ very noticeably in their actual content.
Let us imagine a situation. Aziz from Tashkent bought a motor insurance policy with broad “all risks” coverage. A few months later, during strong wind, a large branch fell on his car in a parking area. The hood, windshield, and fender were damaged, and the repair cost was estimated at 18 million soums.
What happens next:
The conclusion is very clear: the point of “all risks” protection is that the car owner gets not a narrow policy for one scenario, but broader financial protection against different problems that really happen in life.
Dilshod from Tashkent bought extended motor insurance because his car was new. After a strong wind, a branch fell on the vehicle in a parking area, and the hood and windshield repair was estimated at 12 million soums.
If such a risk was included in the coverage, an “all risks” policy is exactly the type of protection that should work here. That is the whole point of such insurance: it is not only for road accidents.
Shahnoza from Samarkand saw scratches and a dent on the door of her car in the morning after it had been parked near her home overnight. The damage was significant, even though there had been no actual road accident.
In a narrower program, such a case may be outside the coverage. But in a policy with a broad set of risks, third-party actions or damage outside an accident are often included separately.
Bekzod from Andijan was sure that the phrase “all risks” meant absolute protection against any problem. But when he looked at the terms, he found that some cases had limitations, and the policy had a deductible and exclusions.
That is how he understood a simple thing: it is important to look not only at the loud product name, but also at the specific content of the coverage. That is why in motor insurance, “all risks” means broad protection, but not unlimited protection.
Our experts will help you choose the best insurance coverage